top of page
Search

Bear Markets Take No Prisoners

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • 3 min read

I’m looking forward to when 10-year Treasuries yield 5 percent, now at 4.4%. There should be a retreat into quality at that point. High yield corporates could face plenty of financial trouble so then 6% yields aren’t enough. Some of my ragamuffins show more slippage. Cleveland Cliffs is a chancy steel producer and Macy’s has lost past years’ luster. 


You won’t get any help from our FRB, either. They’ve just told you so. What a dumb thing to utter. Spineless they be! I see the Trump-made consumer recession inevitable with no help from capital goods coming. Consider how the charts on imports will read less than mighty. As 10-year yields on Treasuries work higher, more of us will become religious savers. The escalation of new tariffs on autos makes me shudder and wonder when I’ll be a new car candidate. 


We’re likely to see Ford trading in single digits for some time, but General Motors will cover its cash dividend.  I see capital goods sectors like steel, copper and aluminum fading more. 


Energy sells on its yield coverage. In my scenario the heartland of our country fades, more. 


Stocks like Deere, Caterpillar Tractor go nowhere. Severe earnings upsets like United Health’s overnight trigger 25% or more upsets. The Magnificent 7 becomes another fiasco of excess optimism. 


Think of dozens of trillion dollar asset funds that churn their portfolios. They stay fully invested through thick ‘n thin. Have they even begun to think about cutting back to say 60% invested from 100%? 


Then, what to do if your own investment pie chart moves into the range of 60% equities, 40% bonds. A few years ago stocks and bonds declined in tandem. Pie chart portfolios for families who thought they were covered from a bear market dropped around 18%. Because high grade debt still carries comparatively low interest rates, portfolio declines would run deeper. Don’t rule it out. 


Am I the only one who played in a market that sold over 20 times earnings?  Long Treasuries once yielded in double digits. I was borrowing deal money at around 10% that was callable overnight. 


Lemme deal with what can happen to hard assets in a recessionary setting. First off, there’s the very rich who buy $100 million pieces of art or even $20 million canvases. They easily get schmeissed for big numbers. 


Paintings can become unsalable for a couple of years if financial markets get too noisy and weak. I’ve seen pieces soar from $1,000 to $100 million, too. Basquiat, for example.


Inflation in home prices also can be foolish, but hardly ever more than a double over a decade. What if Trump relents, calls off slapping huge tariffs on most everything? The Fed joins in making short term rates easy, cutting overnight rates by 100 basis points. The money supply is boosted, big time. 


Because of a sudden accumulation of buy orders and short covering they can’t open the stock market for over 5 hours. It’s like when the Russian ship bearing missiles approached Cuba and then was turned back by us. Then, our domestic 

market, which was shut down for 5 hours, came back to life, chitter n’ chatter. 


Today, I’m 25% long equities but not a short seller, too. Stocks I want to own fall into the growth category and in financials. My list would include Apple, Amazon, Morgan Guaranty Trust, and Goldman Sachs. In short, I’d be adding to what I already own.


I don’t see the bull market case in energy. Look what just happened to Occidental Petroleum. A month or so ago OXY traded in the fifties while Buffett filled out his position as a major holding. Now it trades at $40. 


We’re in a setting where a lot can go wrong. There are ragamuffins trading in single digits that could fade out. I’m thinking of the capital goods and commodities sectors. Can a steel producer like Cleveland Cliffs make it through a down cycle? I dunno.  Airlines like American struggles and even Ford rests in single digits.  Icahn’s oil play IEP ticks there, too. 


Macy’s, once a snappy New York retailer, trades at $11 along with George Soros’s Rivian. His nuclear car play, struggling 

and volatile. Goldman Sachs, meantime, ticks over $500. A very liquid house that leads in both the short and long sides.


Guys in hard hats are still losing traction. Over 50 years ago, U.S. Steel was a white collar blue chip. Nobody wore t-shirts and made billions upon billions. Boardrooms,  mainly stayed quiet and uneventful.  Management was insular. They wouldn’t hire Jewish boys out of college for their training programs, a big mistake. 


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page