top of page
Search

Buy My Shirtless Ragamuffins

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Dec 4, 2023
  • 3 min read

The theme here is re-assertion of earnings power to previous peaks no more than two years out. I have taken already a major position in Macy’s as most doable barring recession. Skeptical on IEP as I don’t see stronger energy prices. Hawaiian Electric is the most difficult to build out a recovery story. Easiest to model is Ford and American Airlines, right now.


Trail-blazing stocks like Microsoft, Apple and Amazon do peak out. I write covered options against such positions and lose money.


Nowadays, triple stocks like Microsoft levitate whale a 12 dollar number like American Airlines, stagnate . AAL’s numbers are chancy, while Microsoft, like Ole Man River just keeps rolling along.


In my teens I peddled blown up cat balloons at the Macy Day Parade. I’d net 50 bucks on my stock that cost me around 20 cents apiece. They called me Pinkus the Peddler.


I retain a soft spot for stocks that trade around 10 bucks. Bought Nextel. It started off as an independent telephone network that sold at $3. When it developed a

legit cellular system nobody believed the user saturation level would exceed 10%.

But, usage kept expanding and I tapped out at $33. So much for analysts projections. Years later we’re above 110% saturation.


Deeply embedded is the concept that legitimate operators with wherewithal to run their business in hard times do survive. Halliburton a good example. Past oil cycle it peaked over $30 a share and then crumpled to five dollars. Management cut back overhead sharply and survived.


HAL has gone around the clock six times and trades today in the thirties. Such a heady gain is the equivalent of a growth stock’s trajectory over a five-year span. But, where’s Polaroid and Xerox now? Don’t ask.


Finding ragamuffins ain’t a seat-of-pants exercise. Mike Milken invoked his MAD Ratio: The market value of a company’s equity had to equal the market value of its debt. Such equilibrium indicated the company in question was bankable. It could sell debt and equity, and stay in business. This was true in the case of Chrysler. Under Iacocca, a big winner


Spring of 2020, my list of playables proved extensive. It included even General Electric, Alcoa, Ford, even MLP, Energy Transfer Partners. Sold at a yield of 9% now 7.5%. Included US Steel, too, which now trades in the thirties with a would be acquirer’s bid in the thirties.


Nothing is easy. Consider Walmart, just sunk 10% overnight on a disappointing quarterly report. I rank Macy’s, selling in low tens as one of my newly embraced properties. There’s $2 a share in latent earnings there even in a soft economic recovery. No FRB tightening is coming and the money supply is ample. Retailing is a legit recovery play. So Ragamuffins selling at 10 times recovered earnings make sense. No recession around the corner.


Playing the shirtless wonders, you need diversity by industry groups. Let me cite half a dozen stocks I’ve begun to dabble in. First is Macy’s, which I regard as a seasoned retailer with geographic diversity, starting with its parent store in Times Square. I see recovery earnings at $2 a share. The stock can sell at 15 times expected earnings. Puts it in the thirties, a double.


Some prospects are cyclicals, industrials like auto makers. All are familiar. Ford sells at $10. Then, there’s Cleveland Cliffs which aims to take over U.S. Steel. In the 2008–’09 financial mess, I tapped out with Lehman, which had dabbled in real estate and lost balance sheet stability.


I see American Airlines is a legit spec at $12. Upcycle earnings power is over $2 a share. Master limited partnerships, yielding 8% are still feared because lower energy quotes do impact their pipeline through past volume. My investment is in Enterprise Products Partners, but my spec is Energy Transfer Partners yielding 8%.


Retain the basic theme of a relatively friendly FRB, moderate interest rates, and normalized GDP expansion. I hold, too, some 2-year Treasuries currently yielding 4.7%. It’s above the rate of inflation.


If you care, use 2-year Treasuries yielding 4.7%. They cover you on the expected rate of inflation these days. Not my game which is doing things I’m afraid to do.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page