top of page
Search

Can Core Holdings Do The Job?

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • 31 minutes ago
  • 3 min read

After Microsoft’s haircut, some 55 points, I wondered if the old “buy ‘n hold” formula of investing still worked. Long ago, I owned American Express after it sustained the client swindle in salad oil. Buffett held on for 50 years and AXP made him super rich. I held on only for a couple of years. Just a good trade, not a mind- blowing cha-cha-cha.


Early 1960s, I cottoned onto Polaroid and Xerox which made me comfortable. I loved these managements for super productive research in instant photography and document reproduction. But Edwin Land’s research in the end game failed him. It never rose past picture-in-a-minute capacity with great definition. 


For Xerox, core products in document reproduction never rose above its 914-copying machine. After maybe a decade of dominance, Sony and Nikon took copying to a higher level at a lower cost. I remember, Edwin Land would show off his new products at open air meetings held in a Boston park. Finally, innovation failed Polaroid and it faded fast into the sunset. 


Hard not to assume that nothing is forever for almost all growth stocks. Yes, there are exceptions in the ethical drug industry where operators like Eli Lilly continually field major new drugs. But, consider blow downs like United Health which dropped dozens of points, overnight on a shabby quarterly report. UNH for years was considered a prime growth stock in healthcare. 


These days, I own no more than half-a-dozen stocks.  Being 30% invested has saved me from serious shrinkage in net worth, but it hasn’t of late made me richer either. My overweighted holdings consist of Amazon, American Express, Boeing, Eli Lilly and Goldman Sachs. Macy’s, I bought years ago, is my low-priced spec in retailing. Now a 3% weighting, a pure luxury and acting buoyantly.  


Look what just happened to Saks, a chapter 11 bankruptcy filing for a luxury retailer that has been around as long as I can remember. I never owned a stock that overnight collapsed 40 points, but Eli Lilly just did it. Make it a hundred points down before its snap back. 


My mother was a loyal customer at Macy’s a century ago. Remember the ballad’s key lines “Give My Regards To Broadway. Remember Me to Herald Square.” 


I carry half a dozen low priced ragamuffins. My list still carries Macy’s now around 20 bucks. Other ragamuffins include Cleveland Cliffs and Hawaiian Electric. 


The challenge in growth investors is whether historically huge premiums in price-earnings ratios are sustainable. Already, we’ve seen corrections in a bunch of growthies like Eli Lilly.  Not just tech houses, but financials, healthcare and industrials. The list grows longer. GE is a great recovery play in aerospace while Boeing did languish. Banks have see-sawed in a wide trading range. Your entry point is crucial. 


I bought more Boeing. Then, I dug a hole in the ground and whispered “ I bought more Lilly after its 100-point schmeis. Next day, Lilly rallied back 100 points. I’ve never seen such volatility, ever. 


My major positions entail Goldman Sachs, Amazon and American Express but patience runs short on AXP while Boeing has been brought back. Keep paring back your holdings and you’ll soon find yourself 30% invested like me. I’ve bought loads of 30-year Treasuries with new cash reserves. The 4.8% yield is good enough for now. 


Leading indicators on inflation in consumer prices and housing now seem benign. I’m not expecting commodity inflation or rising prices for housing. With massive lay offs in the technology sector, employment costs in the country rest containable. 


Net, net, I’m still looking for the macro indicators like low commodity pricing and flattish employment costs that can keep price-earnings ratios from slipping below mid-teens. As for the “buy and hold” investment precept, it’s still under challenge. At my back I hear price-earnings ratios still seem too high. 


I carry Eli Lilly which just shed some 70 points. Never held a stock that so readily did the flop. So far, I’m hanging in. 


Coca-Cola was ahead a point, a new high. Meanwhile, I remember flirting with Coke for the past 5 years, but I didn’t touch it. Eli Lilly now is 80 points below the high of a week ago. Helluva fast track. 


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
My Recovery Spec Is Boeing

I got excited about jet aircraft more than 70 years ago. Actually, I lost my hearing jumping out of an aircraft during the Korean War. That was an early fifties experience. Nobody won. Just a “cease f

 
 
 
On Great Operators Always Average Down

Trump’s chop to American Express on limiting their card interest rate to 10% initially clipped it for a dozen or so points. But, no general market relapse on the Big Board emerged and AXP rallied some

 
 
 
Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page