top of page
Search

GE’s Dismemberment Mirrors The Industrial Heartland

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Jul 18, 2022
  • 3 min read

Early sixties on I’ve ignored what’s called GDP stocks. Managements, 50 years ago, like General Motors, General Electric, U.S. Steel et al. still remained respected, if not revered. Totally Waspy, in their starched white shirts and double-breasted shark-skin suits.


Heartland industries are managing through disrupting supply chain glitches and turmoil in their labor pools. Topping out of commodity inflation for copper, steel and aluminum will lower future costs of goods sold after an inflation of 100% or more past 18 months.


Commodity plays like Freeport-McMoRan, Alcoa and U.S. Steel now stand as much as 40% below highs made just a couple of months ago. These stocks can jitterbug as much as 10%, intraday. Same goes for oil service paper like Schlumberger and Halliburton. Penalties for being out of sync with stock groups go up ‘n’ up.


I miss old Wall Street, late fifties. At the annual UJA dinner, you were told by Gus Levy of Goldman Sachs to cough up $10,000. Serious money then for many of us. Everyone knew anybody who mattered. Shared best ideas, lunching at NYSE’s buzzing restaurant.


Gabbed about Xerox, Polaroid and IBM, yet technology was just a sliver of S&P 500 sector weightings, no bigger than utilities or financials. Commanding sectors were energy, industrials and consumer staples like Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble. Revered by the Street for their unassailable compounding of earnings and market share.


In the Great Depression we drank Pepsis. Coke was a nickel but Pepsi, 3 cents for 12 ounces, Coke forever, a 6-ounce bottle. When I looked at a 50-year chart for Coca-Cola I was kinda surprised. Traded under $10 for decades and then sprinted to $40, late nineties. KO (Coca-Cola) plunged to $20 in the bear market of 2001. Took nearly 15 years for its recovery to $40. Then, a great piece of paper, sprinting past $60 past couple of years. Warren Buffett hung in, but from its high, over $40, late nineties, KO is ahead just 50%.


Because of high valuation for internet paper, Buffett missed early entry into Apple, Meta Platforms, and Alphabet. Microsoft traded at $50 in 2016. What shocked me was utterly woeful performance of basic industrials, the heartland, for over half a century. General Electric, for example, topped out around $450 over 20 years ago and now ticks in low sixties, with a classic head-and-shoulders chart pattern. Five years ago, GE ticked over $200.


Jack Welsh, GE’s charismatic headman leveraged the balance sheet, lopped hundreds of thousands off payrolls and repositioned GE, particularly in the insurance sector which went nowhere but allowed him to manage earnings.


Back 50 years, the Street considered GE a polite piece of paper. Sold at a premium to the market, but shoulda sold at a complexity discount after Welsh dug in his nails.


In 2001, GE was numero uno in the S&P 500 with a market capitalization of $416 billion. Nobody else even close to this figure. Microsoft was a distant numero dos at $291 billion and Exxon Mobil in third place. By 2014, GE’s market cap slid down to $262 billion. Past 5 years, GE rested in last place in the Dow Industrials. Since then, the stock has traded down from over $200 into low sixties. Never underestimate how low a tired blue chip can succumb to. GE yields next to nothing so no possible yield support. Upside earnings now measured in dimes, not dollars.


Compare, then, tech’s great 5-year price run. What surprised me was Microsoft outperformed its peers except for Amazon which of late is stalling, and hard to model quarterly numbers.


My takeaway is only go long industrials after the market has nearly destroyed them, say down from highs by at least 60%. Make sure such ragamuffins have wherewithal to stay in business. I did this exercise early in 2021 with Halliburton, Freeport-McMoRan, Alcoa and U.S. Steel. If the S&P 500 bottoms at 15 times earnings, GE and its ilk should sell at 10 to 12 times.


For a confirmed growth stock player, perhaps I’m a little harsh on GE and its ilk. But, GE’s price history, past 50 years says nada por nada. Guys in T-shirts ended up with 10-figures in front of their names. Jack Welsh struck out.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page