top of page
Search

Growthies That Disappoint Make You Shirtless

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • 2 minutes ago
  • 3 min read

If earnings expectations for iconic growth stocks contract below a 20 multiplier, Microsoft and its ilk wobble and sell down. Tesla, which trades some 70 million shares daily shows no late foot. Where tick the Polaroids and Xeroxes of yester-years?


Over 100-point damage is spreading among growth stocks. It embraces Microsoft, Home Depot, Oracle, United Health, Goldman Sachs and Tesla. This is a who’s who of growthies. Sadly, any stock selling at 30 to 40 times earnings does get cut in half on numbers disappointments. 


I just received in the mail the Goldman Sachs annual report and 2026 Proxy Statement. Normally, I toss such communications into my waste basket. Goldie’s annual stretches 250 pages long while its proxy statement runs over 100 pages. Print size is diminutive here.  I needed a magnifying glass for much of my reading. If this proxy report was presented in normal 10-point type size it would run at least 150 pages. 


Sadly, there is nothing written of the war President Trump wages or its impact on the financial world in terms of valuation and earnings. Is a recession around the corner? What does $111 oil do to inflation, corporate and individual earnings and buying power? Goldman’s return on equity now 15%. 


I’m surprised to see prime growth stocks like Microsoft, Qualcomm and Salesforce testing their lows of the past couple of years. There is no Nifty Fifty left to speak of. No safe stocks to embrace unless you believe $100 plus oil is here to stay as a base price and not a peak soon to plunge back $30 a barrel. Exxon Mobil doesn’t turn me on. 


My list of fading growthies grows longer, not shorter. Aside from the long decline in Microsoft, stocks like Meta, Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson & Johnson and Walmart approach new low ground. Still buoyant remains Coca-Cola, good for the past 50 years or so. 


The market isn’t so approachable on a forward price-earnings ratio of 20 times earnings. Where is the great paper at 15 times earnings? It doesn’t parade as yet. A handful of energy stocks like Exxon Mobil still trade at their highs. 


Goldman’s “Fellow Shareholder” page compares and summarizes results of 2019 with 2025. What caught my eye was that last year’s return on equity was 15% which is not exactly a world beater in a financial services business. At least, it’s a big improvement over 2019 when ROE was just 10%. Book value stood at $357.60. This is an important valuation stat for a financial services business. 


Rarely does a financial operator ever sell at more than 20 times earnings. In a good operative setting, the multiplier for banks is 1.5 times book value. For shaky banks with loan loss issues that may need additional equity financing, you could sell at no more than book value. 


J.P. Morgan sells at 15 times earnings and yields 2%. On a bad day in the market JPM can shed 3%, 8 or 9 points. Volatility for GS is comparable. Right now, I’d worry about JPM’s major earnings sector, asset management. It has to be under pressure. Simply put, iffy financial markets can hurt both operators. 


I never domiciled my assets at GS because they charge a big premium for carrying individual debit balances. With Treasury bond yields approaching 5%, I’m holding more of such paper rather than betting on theTesla type property. 


Stocks that sell near the 1,000-dollar range, like Costco and Eli Lilly, I regard as curiosities rather than playable paper. Corporate lawyers control proxy statements which make them categorically suspect, nearly unreadable. Toss ‘em aside.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Market’s Hardly Playable Until Trump Changes Tune

Trump’s face on a gold coin is the crowning irony of his jagged reign. Not only has our President proved a bad businessman when he got involved in New Jersey gaming where he built a monstrous casino a

 
 
 
Learn How to Ignore Your Stupidities and Soldier On

Once I cherished Boeing. Today it's history.  I got excited about jet aircraft when Boeing introduced its 707 jetliner some 70 years ago. Douglas Aircraft introduced its DC 9 then too, but they’d unde

 
 
 
When Markets Slide How to Stop Blood Flow?

Structure not stock selection is what counts. I’ve sold down to a 25% long portfolio with the rest mainly in 10-year and 30-year Treasuries. I won’t own high yield corporates because I fear the busine

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page