top of page
Search

Ignoring Financial History Makes You Into Goat Meat

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Jan 9, 2023
  • 4 min read

By now, most everyone owning financial assets knows, or has been told by his advisor, that 2022 was a one-off year for stocks and bonds. Your bond portfolio is supposed to cushion paper losses from stocks but, it didn’t happen. Conservative investors suffered nearly 20% shrinkage in portfolios structured with 60% equities and 40% in bonds. Wealth managers forever run trillions of dollars in this pie chart construct.

Over 60 years, I’ve never owned Treasuries, excepting the cycle when Paul Volcker, the Fed's chairman, put interest rates up to 15%. I bought then a traunch of 5-year FNMA notes yielding 15%. My partners tried mightily to push me out the window of our 42nd floor office.

This cycle, I bought a bunch of 2-year Treasuries when their yield crossed 4% months ago. I now sit with a sizable loss in this paper as the yield curve between 2-year and 10-year paper turned negative, a rarity in financial history. Nobody is worthy enough to explain why this has happened, and when it could unwind. The Great Humbler, (the market) strikes again. Do what seems conservative and lose a bunch.

Meanwhile, the market looks to be selling at 19 times forward 12 months earnings power, Pundits still wax bullish, I’ve made money in a market selling at 10 times earnings, even 15 times earnings. But, can’t rationalize today’s heady outlook for the economy, interest rates, and S&P 500 earnings power reigniting. Wage inflation remains exuberant with the FRB still poised in tightening posture.

Finally, everyone can point to the come-uppance for properties, like Tesla, Meta-Platforms, Alphabet, even Amazon, Microsoft and Apple. All such carried a near uniform bullish consensus too long for the coming year. Just a few neutrals hang in. Nobody picked up on their coming earnings collapse. Nobody dares face the facts that you can’t build a reliable model for next year‘s numbers.

So gimme Exxon Mobil and I’ll build you an earnings model based on a range of quotes for crude oil and refining margins. Throw in that Exxon's future yield will be at 5% in today’s quotes. Such numbers are at least competitive with 2-year Treasury yields. When I reviewed a couple dozen 13f reports on high profile operators, I found nobody overweighted in energy except Carl Icahn. Still Carl traded out of his Occidental Petroleum position prematurely.

For the country, there’s a bedrock relationship between interest rates, inflation and the price-earnings level for stocks. Further, when the financial world struggles in disarray like the bank mortgage meltdown of 2008-’09, the market does sell down to book value. Lest we forget, Lehman Brothers was allowed to fail. It’s proud name of no avail, Merrill Lynch was forced to merge into Bank America, valued at $4 share, so no total tap out.

Similarly, in 2001, the blow up in financial assets, created a deep recession that destroyed value in all corners. The NASDAQ 100 index rested in shambles selling down to 200 from 1,200, thereby creating an eye-arresting sombrero formation. Nasty stuff. I keep telling myself stocks can sell anywhere.

NASDAQ “SOMBRERO”

Weekly High/Low Price & 40-Week Moving Average




My old friend, Leon Levy, who ran the Oppenheim operation, then shorted NASDAQ and went long, the Euro, a simple, but great spread. If you have to think about a great short for more than 10 minutes, it’s probably not a good to do. Past year, Tesla was a comparable short play on the basis that its business was no longer analyzable. Tesla peaked at over $400 a share but now ticks at 113.


Price compression in 2001 for big cap tech houses ranged from a modest 21% on Microsoft to 77% for Cisco Systems. This slide took place while Paul Volcker pressed interest rates from 7% to 15%. Thereby, Volcker rid the country of its

built-in inflationary expectations. Jimmy Hoffa’s Teamsters lost traction as the auto industry turned to dust. Wage increases of 7% per annum were history. The market sold down to book value, and yielded 5%. Chrysler was bailed out by the U.S. Treasury. I made lots of money in their $25 preferred stock which had traded down to 5 bucks.

It pays to watch how savvy businessmen invest their stock market capital. Kirk Kerkorian bought over 10% of Chrysler’s capitalization, some 28 million shares under $10, on the eve of C’s 1992 new model introductions. By yearend C ticked at $36 a share. Chrysler had reentered the analyst universe after appreciating 250%.

Individual net worth over $100 million was a rarity in the 1960s, comparable today with $10 billion. Everyone missed the call on the 1982 worldwide recession, ignoring the group of seven monetists led by Paul Volcker. The S&P 500 sold down to practically nothing. It took 18 years to get back to 1400. Presently, we’re at 3838. Nobody today is calling for a market above 4000 next 12 months. I’m at 3000 a year out because I sense recession around the corner with corporate earnings clicking some 10% lower.

We’ll see.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

1 Comment


Jaime Madrinan
Jaime Madrinan
Jan 09, 2023

Martin, I have enjoyed your columns (Forbes) and books for many years and hope can continue doing so for many more.

In this case, I think there is some confusion about mentioning market decline in 2001 and Paul Volcker : chairman was Allan Greenspan who took rates up from 4.0 to 6.5

In any case, your comments and caution for 2023 are well noted and will serve me a a guide and a reminder to be extra carefull

Like
Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page