top of page
Search

Is The Play In Cyclicals Overdone?

  • Feb 16, 2021
  • 3 min read

Updated: Oct 19, 2021



A year ago the going price on much cyclical paper was around 5 bucks a share. But most commodity plays in copper, steel, aluminum and oil service have sprinted around the clock several times past 12 months.


Halliburton based out at $4.25 a share now ticks around $20 while Freeport-McMoRan copper is pushing into the thirties. The most polite cyclical of all, Schlumberger was $16.87 past March, now $26.


Even General Electric doubled, from yes, 5 bucks while Macy’s tripled after posting huge operating losses. Shopping centers, anybody? The 52-week low on General Motors hit 14 dollars and change. Nobody wanted US Steel at $4.54, now over $16.


What’s going on? A year ago, pundits all waxed bearish, a Covid-19 bred recession loomed. Leveraged cyclicals faced the hangman. Even Occidental Petroleum, a self-made leveraged disaster at $8.52 down from the fifties.


But, 2 trillion dollar capitalizations like Apple doubled over 12 months so you could counter why take ultimate financial risk owning ragamuffins.


Reason is once a viciously cyclical company weathers bankruptcy risk it can double or triple over 12 months. General Motors shot from $14 to $57 without me (asleep at the switch!)


Biggest question to ask yourself is what’s the fundamental earnings power of a stock facing hard times if and when the cycle turns up? Then factor in average earnings power of the stock-good year, bad year, average one. If this average comes in under 10 times earnings, close your eyes and give the animal a home. No need to throw darts.


Ask yourself about the price trajectory of GameStop. Well, GME carries with it no earnings power or even book value substance of more than a couple of bucks. I don’t know of any day traders who built fortunes they nailed down.


When the music stops, who’s left to pick up the pieces?


With some 60 years as an operator, I hardly ever took the short side. I love to bet on entrepreneurial energy. Consider Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, even Zuckerberg and Bezos today. My old heroes embraced Edwin Land of Polaroid and Joe Wilson, headman at Haloid-Xerox, later just plain Xerox.


I met Rupert Murdoch when he bought New York Magazine which I part-owned as a venture capital play. Rupert built Fox into a major media house from scratch. His market capitalization dwarfs the Sulzberger’s New York Times property which has been around 150 years.


Currently, I am in love with MLP’s where you still can find 9% yields fully covered by operating cash flow. Enterprise Products Partners is the most conservative play, easily living within its numbers, not extended by too liberal a shareholder distribution which is partly a return on capital.


Meantime, the yield on 30-Year Treasuries is hardly more than 2% with 10-year paper of late oozing past par to 1.17%. At some point, the price-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 Index won’t hang in at 20 times earnings. Let’s hope this event isn’t around the corner where bonds are good competition to stocks.


If your portfolio doesn’t carry a strong reflation theme embracing cyclicals, financials like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, you may be left at the post. Let somebody else own Coca-Cola, Pfizer and other polite properties. Bound to be underperformers. My go against the grain growth stock is Alibaba, but so far I’m wrong.


Is Warren Buffett still the smartest guy in the room? Maybe not. Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio has underperformed its benchmark S&P 500 Index these past five years.


If you didn’t make at least 10% 4th quarter of 2020, you musta been asleep. Actually you shoulda posted over 15% which is what the NASDAQ 100 posted. Citigroup rose 50%, Halliburton practically doubled and Freeport-McMoRan galloped ahead effortlessly.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page