top of page
Search

Shareholder Rape A Repeatable Offense

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • May 8, 2023
  • 3 min read

When an annual report opens with the phrase “your company” toss it in the wastebasket, immediately. It is not your company. It’s management’s company. Anyone who talks about shareholder democracy should be jailed. The shareholder’s vote is as powerful a voice as a referendum in Afghanistan.


The individual investor probably spends 5 minutes over a corporate annual report. Proxy statements get disregarded, the proxy card unsigned, unmailed. Decades ago, Adolph Berle wrote “The proxy machine has become one of the principal instruments not by which a stockholder exerts power over the management, but by which his power is separated from him.”


Corporate boardrooms, take care of their own. I just read that the headman at Exxon Mobil, Darren Woods, took home $36 million past year. But, the dividend payout ratio for XOM is meagre, approximately 30% of current earnings power. I remember when Exxon’s headman took home, $26 million, inclusive of stock rights, a repeated act.


Have you ever heard of the SEC objecting to corporate proxy materials? First, proxy statements can be half as long as Tolstoy‘s “War And Peace.” The material is crafted by corporate lawyers, who design the make-up in minute type so difficult to decipher without a magnifying glass. The section on management compensation is riddled with corporate jargon to disguise all the capital management has qualified itself for, normally. Over five years or less.


Let’s face the facts. Exxon Mobil was once riding high but proved a horrid stock between 2017 and 2020. It peaked near par, then plummeted below $40 a share. The investment consensus on a specific stock determines its stock price. Major companies show half to three quarters of shares controlled by professional investors. First whiff of fish, they bang out such goods. Then, move on to other stocks in less cyclical sectors of the market, like ethical drug houses, consumer non-durables like Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble. This is happening currently.

Note the move in Eli Lilly.


The investment dilemma can be stated another way. If the biggest and most adequately capitalized corporations can’t consistently achieve a high rate of return over 5 years, you better own them only when profit margins are about to reignite.


This is the earnings momentum (or recovery) play. It helps, too, if you can project interest rates with some accuracy. The history of Wall Street operators is that few of us are so good at what we do. For me, the reciprocal is never position yourself where you can get buried, even bruised, badly.


Exxon Mobil is a good example. In 2001 XOM was number 3 on the S&P 500 Index with a market capitalization pushing $400 billion, right behind Microsoft. Mid 2020 Microsoft’s market cap was at $1 trillion. Exxon down to $160 billion from $324 billion, mid 2019, a mini-disaster in a major property.


You can appreciate why I’m enraged at its headman awarding himself $36 million. Market cap in 2014 was pushing $400 billion. The price of oil made this guy rich, not for his management initiatives.



EXXON MOBIL PRICE CHART








Since 2001, Exxon has consistently and methodically, held within its operating cash flow construct – but got hardly anywhere. Early sixties, Tom Watson, in an aside, told me IBM (Watson) had bet the company on development of its 360 computer. (They won)

This case is clear-cut. For large cap oil field operators, point of entry is critical. Spring of 2020, Exxon bounced from $30 to $50 a share, but far below its previous high of $80. Today’s weakness in oil futures is impacting the energy sector across-the-board.


Thumbing through my “Silent Investor, Silent Loser,” published in 1986, I found this nugget: Bob Kobel, then my director of marketing, said to me one day: "I've watched you for years and now I understand it.”

“ What do I do? I’m not sure I know what I do anymore,” I said.


“Well the first thing is you find a company with position on the board. It could be the New York Times, Dow Jones, even Boeing. The company has to have market presence.”


The first stock I ever made serious money on was Electrolux. I liked the machine and read in “Consumer Reports” that they raised prices biannually. The stock traded OTC at six times earnings. My first wife insisted I buy her this damn expensive machine. I got even and bought the stock, too. Electrolux then sat relatively cheap and undiscovered.


“Hi Bob. Once again I own Boeing. They need to get their act together on aircraft assembly and quality control. I’m waiting and waiting.”



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page