top of page
Search

Vanity Embraces High-Priced Stocks

  • May 14, 2021
  • 4 min read



Olden days, management split their high-priced stock, pushing it back down into fifties. Such a gesture was considered enticing for new shareholder interest, but no longer.

Warren Buffett years ago railed against stock splits because they added no value. But even Warren divided Berkshire into 2 stock classes, one trading at $2,000 or so and the other in the $250 range. Some tech houses today trade between $2,000 and $3,000. I’m talking about Amazon and Alphabet. Plenty of $500 to $1,000 jobs like Tesla, Netflix, Shopify and Blackrock jitterbug across my Bloomberg screen.

I wanted to give each of our grandchildren a round lot of Amazon, but we’re talking $3,200 a share. A hundred shares is enough for college, maybe twice over. In 2015, Amazon sold around $500, then a manageable sum, but still serious money. Jeff Bezos worth over $100 billion is giving Bill Gates a serious run for the roses. Actually, my experience suggests it’s much harder for a $5 ragamuffin to double or triple than for Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet to attain the moon. Stocks trading at 5 bucks or even a $10 number do sell down for good reasons. Operationally, they can be spurting blood like airlines did, or they’re over-leveraged and unable to improve their financial condition. Skimpy cash flow for new initiatives. No investment banker wants them as a client ripe for an underwriting.

Consider, a year ago you could have bought a handful of forlorn ragamuffins trading around 5 bucks a share. The list embraced retailers, energy MLP’s and vicious cyclicals like Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Halliburton. Throw in U.S. Steel and Alcoa. Macy’s was a throwaway as was GE and American Airlines. You could smell blood gushing from American Airlines vacant seats. With some hesitation I bought a block of American Airlines 6 ½ convertible debentures amid a difficult underwriting setting.

All such throwaways a year later show doubles, triples and quadruples like Freeport McMoRan and US Steel. By comparison, the S&P 500 rose 50% and NASDAQ 100 a little more. Yes, it seemed you took ultimate financial risk. If you did your homework, all of these dogs carried enough balance sheet wherewithal to stay alive a year longer. Some, like Freeport and General Electric, longer, maybe 2 years before possible death and destruction. U.S. Steel recently raised equity at $16 a share, the stock currently ticking at $25 now.

Past 12 months Freeport McMoRan galloped from $5 to a $33 price point. Count on your fingers, that’s over 500%. Try 400% for US Steel, GE touched down in low single digits, but decades ago was number one in the S&P 500 list with a market cap of $450 billion. Proud Macy’s was a $5 number with American Airlines a respectable $10 piece of paper, now $24. All carried in the wave of the reflating economic setting. That’s all you needed to believe in. Nothing more. Alcoa zipped from $7 to $33. Do you remember Ford at 4 bucks, now over $12?

Ford has lasted in business over a century. Halliburton zipped up from $5, too. Now trading low to mid-twenties.

The ready conclusion is stocks can and do sell anywhere. Occidental Petroleum’s all time high surged over $80, basing out at $10 just 6 months ago. The chart on Citigroup looks like an expert’s ski trail, down from over $80 yearend 2019, basing out mid-thirties a year ago and presently back over $70. One helluva schuss. Amazon was a $500 stock 5 years ago, now ticking over $3,100.

My bloodless conclusion is rules and platitudes on stock picking are made to be broken and discarded. They’re useless. Each cycle carries its own embedded craziness within growth and value sectors. Technology blows hot and cold. Cyclical paper is probably least understood of all market sectors. Once a stock drops down below $10 or even $20, analysts crawl back into their holes and clam up. You’re on your own. Anyone can buy and hold Microsoft, a battleship plowing the waves, exuding power and stability. Conversely, the art of buying paper under 10 bucks starts with the balance sheet. You consider how long the laggard in question can stay in business. Then figure out how leveraged is earnings power to an economic revival. You need to own half a dozen because 1 or 2 can tap out. When I’m buying a stock, say Freeport- McMoRan a year ago, under 5 times normalized earnings, I’m all in.

A good $5 piece of paper can outshine Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet…at least for a year or two. Own both worlds? Pair Amazon and Microsoft with Macy’s and General Electric. Martin Sosnoff and his managed accounts own: Freeport-McMoRan, Halliburton, Alcoa, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Macy’s, General Electric, U.S. Steel, Citigroup, American Airlines Convertible

Disclosure: I am/we are long MSFT.

Additional disclosure: Martin Sosnoff and his managed accounts own: Freeport-McMoRan, Halliburton, Alcoa, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Macy’s, General Electric, U.S. Steel, Citigroup, American Airlines Convertible


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
When Markets Slide How to Stop Blood Flow?

Structure not stock selection is what counts. I’ve sold down to a 25% long portfolio with the rest mainly in 10-year and 30-year Treasuries. I won’t own high yield corporates because I fear the busine

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page