top of page
Search

Wrong Footed Picks Costly Overnight Hits

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Jul 28, 2025
  • 3 min read

Updated: Aug 1, 2025

On some of the biggest capitalization stocks, cost of a wrong earnings call is a snappy 10%. You would think the Street gets estimates closer to reality but it ain’t necessarily so. Chipotle, a 9% position in Pershing Square Capital Management, fifth largest holding, broke around 10%, overnight. 


Starting with Tesla, capitalized at $300 billion, the earnings consensus missed badly, but why? It seemed obvious that new car sales weren’t sailing off the floor. Daily trading in TSLA normally runs around 50 million shares before lunchtime, and near 100 million shares daily. Woof!


Meanwhile, institutional rated Chipotle, the Mexican grill operator, showed declining store sales and flopped 13% after its elongated growth record failed. Another case of a “nothing is forever” stock. 


And, yet, stocks like Microsoft do elevate some 10% on a good day, while IBM does the fade out, 10%,  on weak numbers. A simplistic GDP stock like Dow Chemical which has been cut in half, year-to-date, dropped nearly 20% overnight.  I can understand American Airlines dropping 10% on a loss quarter, but Dow and IBM? 


Gimme a break! All such downside trouble suggests the market, itself, may be 10% overpriced. Analysts following such stocks are no help. All they do is mark down long term price projections, but nothing drastic. 


There is a reciprocal raised price projections on stocks reporting good numbers, but only minimally. Las Vegas Sands, a good example, posted a great quarter, but I note J.P. Morgan stays neutral, price target at $56 with the stock over $50. As I drafted this piece, at 12 noon, the drop for Tesla was 30 points on 90 million shares traded off some 10%.  Microsoft was having a good day, up 5 points or 10%. 


Maybe day traders solely should be playing Tesla. When I was a player in Polaroid, Xerox and then Fairchild Camera,  I was on a first name basis with executives there. Information retrieval was readily available for the asking fifty years ago. 


Nobody ever called Polaroid’s maximum leader anything but Dr. Land.  He would talk the talk on instant photography. Land held Polaroid’s annual meetings al fresco in a Boston park. Steve Jobs at Apple learned from Dr. Land and to show off Apple’s new product developments in wireless phones. 


I miss those days when following exciting corporate developments in technology was a rational, fact-finding endeavor and not a day-trading circus. I’d promise my clients that Polaroid and Xerox could ratchet higher by 3%, quarterly. Those days, growth stock investors embraced time spans of 5 years or more. But, I learned how to sell out such growthies when the competitive forces like Canon and Nikon happened. 


When I got back from lunch, Chipotle had traded 55 million shares. It was making a new annual low at 45 ½, trading 55 million shares, producing many bailouts. The market itself, just off fractionally at 30 basis points. All was not black. Microsoft was holding its gain of 6 points, over 10%. 


When I first came into this business in 1959 the average day on the Big Board was 4 million shares at an average price of 50 dollars per share. Polaroid had made a handful of operators super rich in the fifties, followed by Xerox and then Syntex, in early sixties.  Most of us kept to ourselves, private rather than advertise our gains.  


Buying stocks on margin then was frowned upon, just for crazy traders. Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board were  revered figures, deeply feared by operators like yours truly.  I had sniffed inflationary expectations and our country turning uncompetitive, but taking margin requirements into double digits?  Does anyone but me remember 12% margin and 9% for deal money for banks? 


I saw Chipotle close down over 7 points on 77 million shares. This, a Mexican food purveyor, not Xerox or Polaroid showing a bad quarter. It was a quiet day for the S&P 500, up 4 points.. Stocks selling near 1,000 bucks like Netflix, Costco, Eli Lilly, Meta and BlackRock had a comparatively good day. Including Goldman Sachs.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The Market Sits Like A Heavy Necklace

Magnificence, like the size of a fortune, is a comparative thing. Booth Tarkington in his classic novel “ The Magnificent Ambersons” posed the idea that to make a fortune while others are losing fortu

 
 
 

1 Comment


brich
Aug 08, 2025

Appreciate your posts, Martin. Hard to understand why these companies continue to report in after-market-hours in this environment, and allow the algorithmic trading shops to whack bids in an illiquid market. Then the media gets to pile on -- with seventeen and a half hours to build a negative view into the market psychology, until legitimate volume comes in the next morning. Doesn't make sense. They should all be reporting during market hours. - Best, Bryan

Like
Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page