top of page
Search

Yellow Brick Road’s Ahead

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • Jan 30, 2023
  • 3 min read

I keep my 1960’s pocket slide rule on my desk, a reminder that numbers, not words, finally govern stocks. Courage, alas, is a seldom mentioned trait of a winning money manager who believes in his numbers, poised to buy and sell, buy and sell.


You sense when to go against the grain of sentiment, and what everyone thinks, they know. Judy’s prancing partners on the yellow brick road got it right. Gotta have heart, brains, and courage.


Since the year 2000 the market endured the internet meltdown both in 2001 and currently. The S & P 500 touched down at 800 (yes 800) in the initial internet fiasco of 2001, and later on in the financial meltdown of 2008-09. Fortunately, Bob Rubin was then Treasury Secretary, an alumnus of Goldman Sachs, who endured panics.


Bob and the Federal Reserve Board saved the banks and the country from utter ruin. Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns no longer exist. Lehman Brothers is gone, too. Years later, we took out the right side of the market’s W, the old high made in 2000.


Net, net, violate conventional valuation yardsticks, and get washed out with scant wherewithal to resume as a serious player. The market’s treacherous undulations, particularly in the 2000-09 period, is best captured in thes chart on the NASDAQ Composite Index. Below 1000 in 2002 and then it shot up, over 4000, in 2014. NASDAQ currently trades well over 11,000, heavily weighted in tech house paper now bouncing off past year’s lows.





Nobody talks much about volatility in banks, but in the 2008-09 meltdown, the sector turned into Niagara Falls. From its peak of 120, the KBW Bank Index

plummeted to 20, in a 12-month interlude. In hard times, not just tech gets schmeissed in half or worse.


Market pundits never catch an impending downside move. Nor does the analyst fraternity considering the likes of Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Amazon. It’s not good for brokerage commissions to preach for caution. Nobody ever urges big cutbacks in equity concentration, despite obvious non-delivery. Nobody now urges change in their 60/40 ratio of stocks to bonds. Piechart investing, long in place, but another year of negative returns could change all this. Now it's impacting earnings of major banks where wealth management became a major profit center. Comfortable families, passive investors, may think about taking risk off the table.


I’ve bought a huge tranche of Treasuries where I’m in the red. But, coming back into Alibaba is a big winner. The bet here is Chinese regulators ease up and allow BABA to build out their major holding of Ant Financial into the size and scope of a BlackRock.




Tech’s great 5-year run, 2015 to 2020, is captured in this table. If not overweighted, you probably underperformed the market which rose 50%. Stocks like Microsoft and Amazon went through the roof, advancing nearly 400%. The present rally in tech is a bet on a resurging economy just around the corner. I’m playing Apple and Microsoft which I can understand and model out for a couple of years. Their price -earnings ratios don’t dwell in the clouds.


Focus is on operating cash flow, wherewithal for management to build out its footprint in their businesses. Because I don’t believe a major turn in the market is at hand, I’m focused on assured yields for a sizable chunk of my invested assets. Initial foray into Treasuries now looks foolish, but at least I’ll recover my principal if I hold to maturity on 2-year paper. I can live with opportunity costs lost, by using leverage.


In stocks, craving for a solid 5% rate of return is satisfied with Exxon’s future yield capacity. Actually, I have increased energy investments to 15% of assets with adds to Occidental Petroleum and strongholds in MLPs like Enterprise Products Partners, yielding over 7%. Management's niggardly dividend bumps of a couple of pennies is a trial.


On 9/11, like the Tin Man, I coulda used a heart, too, but nothing to do with investing and everything to do with staying alive. I was attending a board meeting

at NYU, its business school, and was stubborn about leaving the scene adjacent to Twin Towers. My wife, Toni, got me out while I mused Twin Tower, never shoulda been built. But, the New York Port Authority had a capital surplus and this troubled the board. The property leased up slowly, offices and interior design mediocre, uninviting.


Sam Zell once cautioned me, Never inhabit a space that is publicly landmarked. Too dangerous. The Big Board reminds me of Twin Towers. A thunderous throbbing presence, inherently dangerous and uninviting.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page