top of page
Search

I Spell Recession With A Capital “R”

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • May 31, 2022
  • 3 min read

Nowadays, when blindsided by a big earnings shortfall, the write-down overnight ranges anywhere from 15% to over 25%, as in Netflix. Staid operators like Walmart, Costco, Deere and Home Depot can shed mucho dollars, too. I remember, decades ago, they took IBM out to be shot. Polaroid ran out of new toys to sell and Xerox fell off my charts. Japanese 8mm film and cameras took market share.


How many old grizzlies still managing money lived through the deep recession of 1973 – ‘74, the Cuban missile crisis and later Paul Volcker’s early eighties jab in the kishkas? Paul put up money market rates to 15% which collapsed the stock market down to book value from 2 times book. Nobody today calls attention to our market still ticking at 2 times book and 20 times optimistic earnings projections.


During the deep real estate recession in 1973 – ‘74, particularly in the Big Apple, owners of co-ops walked away from their apartments because of their high maintenance charges. Then, I bought a place in the Dakota for $87,500, while everyone lectured me I was out of my skull.


Each generation of money managers and investors sooner or later experiences the bite of a bear market, how it crushes stocks that take forever before their comeback. What I find so eerie is that the unfolding pattern of asset destruction gets repeated, decade to decade.


Lemme take you back some decades. Everyone needs to appreciate that negative returns for the market do last for at least a decade. Real returns for stocks ranged lower than earnings yields throughout our financial history. Even the Greenspan model was deeply flawed. In the absence of rising levels of valuation, real returns are systemically lower than earnings yields throughout our financial history.



Sombrero time? Normally a fully invested skeptic, I hope some sense of valuation bails me out early on. (A sombrero chart pictures a moribund property.) Chartists chant Kaddish over sombreros, but after the rollercoaster ride of 2008 – ‘09 when banks wrote mortgages with flimsy asset coverage, you coulda bought Citigroup and Bank of America for a song. Time of entry is forever the critical factor.



Consider the penalty for a bad entry point back into the market or a stock can be enormous. If you bought the NASDAQ Composite at its top in 2000, it woulda taken you 15 years to recover to its 2000 peak.


I deal with 5-year intervals, the average life of a growth stock’s primacy. I don’t retain Buffett’s patience for holding American Express over 50 years. Averaging down on a stock makes no sense to me.


Reckoning from history in market cycles is critical to understanding where you stand in an unfolding setting. The Street never deals with how much markets can fall. Not good for their business to do so. After all, our major banks carry trillions in invested assets for their clients.


The 60/40 ratio of stocks to bonds prevails, but doesn’t protect you when both stocks and bonds are in retreat. Running your finger over the chart of the S&P 500 from 2000 to 2015 is instructive because it encompasses the internet bubble of 2000 and the financial meltdown of 2008 – ‘09 when banks self-destructed with their mortgage writing excesses.


In both cycles, the S&P 500 crated below 1,000, near book value for stocks. Yields then exceeded 5% and the market sold at 10 times perceived earnings. All this suggests sizable downside room today. Our market yields maybe 2% and sells near 2 times book value.


I delved back further; during the Cuban missile crisis quotes for even big capitalization stocks evaporated. Then, in 1974, on a soft summer’s night President Nixon devalued the dollar and the S&P 500 Index touched down at 100, yes par. Years later, Paul Volcker plunged the country into deep recession, the market again sold down to 100 in 1982, yielding 5.6%. In 2002 the market again bottomed out below 1,000, actually at 800. In summary, bear market bottoms range below 1,000, yield over 5% and sell at 10 times depressed earnings. Today, the S&P 500 flirts with a 4,000 number.




NASDAQ, nearing 12,000, sold around 4,000 less than 10 years ago. There is only 1 conclusion to draw from such numbers. Given a bear market, it’s a long way down from here and now.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page