top of page
Search

Industrial Earnings Power Ready to Rally

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • 6 hours ago
  • 2 min read

When I see airlines like United tacking on 5 points a day while prime growth stocks like Microsoft slip a dozen points overnight, I shudder then add to my Boeing position. At one point 10 percent of my assets rested in Boeing. Microsoft can bunch together plenty of sinking spills, too. Same for Eli Lilly and IBM. 


The conceit of playing a Nifty Fifty list rests shattered along with buying half a dozen prime growthies. They no longer exist. Eli Lilly does shed a dozen points in the blink of an eye and then bounce back. Previous cycles I used to buy great operators like Polaroid and Xerox, but that didn’t last forever, either, just a decade or so.  


Of late, I’m seeing some of my ragamuffins acting much better. Namely, I own Macy’s which can swing 5 percent daily. Cleveland Cliffs has deconstructed and even Hawaiian Electric is bouncy. Let somebody else own pricey bank stocks like J.P. Morgan. If you’re wrong on carrying a mid-teens multiplier you will lose just as much as on a growth stock. 


I just added to positions in reasonably valued growthies like American Express and Boeing.  The space for owning Apple and Microsoft is crowded with wanna be shareholders. There goes Eli LIlly, down a snappy 30 points while Exxon Mobil is buoyant, up 3 points or 3%. Enterprise Products Partners just popped 5%. This is a normally stodgy energy trader. 


It's time for money managers to deal with their lingering disdain for GDP stocks. Look how buoyant General Motors turned on a great operating quarter. I banged out Apple and Microsoft.  Macy’s daily can go plus or minus 5%. Nobody’s talking about Macy’s filing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 


As I write this Eli LIlly has sunk 34 points, over 3 percent. I closed my eyes and bought more.  The stock can fade badly and then recover overnight. 


All such carnage takes place while energy plays hang in and bank stocks remain buoyant. Recurrent slippage in Eli LIlly seems just the ebb and flow of trading. GM can be an up stock with the S&P 500 losing over 1%. Boeing and American Express now buoyant plays still show sinking spells of 3% or more.  


The market looks to me like it wanted to make a bet on the resurgence of industrial earnings power. Caterpillar and Deere are very resurgent day traders. The bet on new machinery orders is paying off. 


In short, prime capital goods stocks, take Deere and Caterpillar Tractor, have acted well past 12 months showing huge percentage gains capable of popping 4% daily. This is not crowded investment space like Microsoft, Apple and Tesla occupy. 


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Can Core Holdings Do The Job?

After Microsoft’s haircut, some 55 points, I wondered if the old “buy ‘n hold” formula of investing still worked. Long ago, I owned American Express after it sustained the client swindle in salad oil.

 
 
 
My Recovery Spec Is Boeing

I got excited about jet aircraft more than 70 years ago. Actually, I lost my hearing jumping out of an aircraft during the Korean War. That was an early fifties experience. Nobody won. Just a “cease f

 
 
 
Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page