top of page
Search

Nobody’s Going To The Moon Tomorrow

  • Martin Sosnoff
  • May 12, 2025
  • 3 min read

With Trump pulling the levers on his wrecking ball, nobody’s going to the moon real soon. The S&P 500 Index is pricey and the guys in steel hats need new orders to keep their furnaces open. I’ve never seen the financial world more discombobulated. But, you’d never know it looking at the prices of Apple, Tesla, Meta, even Goldman Sachs and Netflix. 


I never expected to see Warren pull such a cowardly act as choosing early retirement at the age of 94. Will his successor, a financial man, dare to redistribute hundreds of billions held in Apple and energy plays like OXY?


Meanwhile, ragamuffins in hard hats sell around 10 bucks a share but nobody cares. They earn pennies and could see the wolf at the door. Then, there’re financial stocks like Goldman Sachs selling at over $500. Traders and deal makers, mostly with good outcomes. 


Decades ago, actually, over 50 years, when I decided to go into business as a money manager, I first subwayed down to see Gus Levy at Goldman Sachs for his stamp of approval. Readily granted with the advisory that Gus would call my card at the UJA dinner., “ I’m looking for a nice increase, Gus commented as he finished his simple lunch, baloney sandwich on a seeded roll. 


My 50-year old coverage of value vs. Technology stock performance pretty much sums up my life as a growth stock investor. I’d own growthies just so long as they’d sell at not much more than 1.5 times the S & P 500. But you never 

get your own way. By the time you look at Apple, it’s very pricey. 


Some 50-years ago the “growth-at-any-price” practices started with Morgan Guaranty Trust. They were trashed in the 1973-’74 recession. Nobody talks these days about growthies-at-any-price like Polaroid and Xerox. They were destroyed by technological obsolescence. No development of any new toys to offer to play with. I’d advise my clients back then that they should look for 2% monthly appreciation. But, Polaroid and Xerox ran out of new toys to sell and their stocks became relics of the sixties. 


I'm not immune to General Motors if I saw a strong auto cycle coming. But it’s a rarity when to own the guys who don hard hats at Alcoa, U.S. Steel. Throw in a copper and paper producer, too. Never bought the starched white shirt group, 

either. When the guys in T-shirts came along I listened, particularly to Jeff Bezos et al. I’m still with Jeff at Amazon and I got to Apple early on. If I can’t build a credible spread sheet on a property in question, I’ll pass it by. No Tesla, thank you and I pass on Meta and Nvidia, too. Microsoft now is too efficiently priced but they issue understandable data. 



This chart says you gotta be early on tech houses. At more than 1.5 times corporate earnings. Anything in excess leaves you open for rapid destruction. You won't go to the moon on Microsoft,  but at least it’s ownable on valuation. If you want financial leverage, buy Goldman Sachs. Get a zippy market to go along. Berkshire Hathaway is an obvious play on Apple and oils like OXY. But, I’m not bullish on their world. 


To own a stock at 20 times earnings, you first had to believe in their unwavering high growth rate.  Its reciprocal is a $10 ragamuffin that can’t be modeled with any forecasting power. On a bouncy day in the market,  junk dances up and down some 10%. There is no explanation excepting market forces. Bankers like to see stocks dance in a cha cha cha rhythm, and own a dozen or so that keep you young at heart. 


I wouldn’t want to be in Buffett’s shoes today. His oils leave me cold and Apple could be facing troublesome times during the Trump presidency. It has lost any forecasting powers


Luck and pesetas, Warren. I coulda done what you did. But, I didn’t.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Berkshire Hathaway Lives On

Portfolios can always be a surprise in terms of stock selection and their market weighting. First, lemme say I own Berkshire for what’s largely static,  70 percent resting in Apple, American Express,

 
 
 
Never Too Late, Buying A Museum Piece

1950s, I was a slow-poke in accumulating abstract expressionist art works. NYC was rocking as the center of this new movement, not Paris or London. I missed the reflowering of Renaissance work, too. 

 
 
 
Goldman Sachs, Old Reliable Moon Shot

If wrong on Goldie, I’ll wear a dunce cap filled with humility. Best defense is a strong offense. Let someone else own airlines when traffic turns south.  I can offer you half a dozen stocks that do g

 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Martin Sosnoff

This website and this blog do not provide investing advice.  This website and the blog are for general, informational purposes only and are not to be construed as financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice.   This website and blog contain only the opinions, subjective views, and commentary of Martin T. Sosnoff which are subject to change at any time without notice.  This website and the blog may not be relied on in making an investment or any other decision. Any decision to invest or take any other action may involve risks not discussed herein and no such decisions should be made based on the information contained herein. You agree that Martin T. Sosnoff is not liable for any action you take or decision you make in reliance on any content of this website and/or the blog.   Any decisions based on the content are the sole responsibility of the user.   If you would like financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice, you should consult with your financial advisors, accountants or attorneys regarding your individual circumstances and needs.  None of the information or content presented on the website or the blog should be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, financial instruments, investments or other services.  While Martin T. Sosnoff may use reasonable efforts to obtain information from sources believed to be reliable, Martin T. Sosnoff does not independently verify the accuracy of such information and makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of any information or content on the website or the blog.  Certain information on the website and the blog may contain forward-looking statements.  Martin T. Sosnoff undertakes no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.   Martin T. Sosnoff makes no guarantee or other promise as to any results that may be obtained from using anything contained on the website or the blog.  While past performance may be discussed, past performance should not be considered indicative of future performance.   The information provided on this website and the blog is of general interest and is not intended as investment advice for any reader.  This website and the blog are not and are not intended to be a solicitation for investment management services.

bottom of page